interneta manifesta

As I was admiring my poems in those two latest issues below (yes, I like my poems, so shoot me), I started thinking about the whole online vs. print debate Iā€™ve talked about before, riled about, bitched about. Itā€™s coming down to this lately--I think I simply like submitting things to online journals, even when theyā€™re rejected. The response time, and lead time to the issue, is much faster, more immediate. I can say, ā€œhey, hereā€™s my poem-read it.. (of course you can say ā€œshut the hell up, you suckā€ and choose not to.) My point is that Iā€™ve really gotten tired of six to sixteen month response times, and worse, increasing numbers on just non-responsive editors. But still I like chunky little journals, nice paper, perfect binding (or even lovely little DIY missives like Hot Whiskey). At some point I started shying away from that whole academic complex of journals...the ones Iā€™m told Iā€™m supposed to want to get into. The ones which wouldnā€™t publish me most likely given Iā€™m not swimming with the right sharks, teaching/went to school in the right place, or writing the right sorts of poems, you know, like the ones they already publish. This may sound like bitter boo-whooing, but itā€™s more than that. I have stumbled somehow into a couple more academic journals over the last couple of years; CPR, of course, which always pretty good, and hardly exactly your status quo academic journal, and Spoon River, which feel a little more homegrown, but maybe only since itā€™s published in Illinois and things that seem local arenā€˜t quite so intimidating. I'v submitted to others like Kenyon Review, Jubilat, Field, Smartish Paceat least once, a couple years ago in an ambition fueled frenzy, not really because Iā€™d read much of or liked the journals all that well, but because I was told thatā€™s where I was supposed to be. But it wasnā€™t. I donā€™t read those journals. I canā€™t really afford to, nor inclined to. And Iā€™m not sure I want to spend so much time combing through the drek to uncover the good stuff. I've gleaned that the publish-or-perish climate leads to alot of mediocrity and cronyism to sustain itself. Sort of like snake eating itself thing. I wonder how many people DO read them, regularly, religiously, not because theyā€™re trying to get published but because they enjoy it. Eventually all those poems I submitted to those places wound up online (or in other, cool, indie publications, which Iā€™ll touch on in a second). And I felt stupid for not having sent them to the editors who would have appreciated them first, the people who Iā€™ve gotten a lot of support and encouragement from. Not some cool ivory tower bitch whose completely indifferent to my existence, just because that was what I was supposed to do. Fuck it.

And maybe this isnā€™t a print vs. online discussion at all, since in the last few years Iā€™ve stumbled across a host of awesome, non-university tied/funded, publications--many of which can be found over there in the sidebar, and many of which Iā€™m stoked to have work in, and oddly seem to be read by more people than the heavyweights. It might be just a blog thing..but thatā€˜s cool. I definitely hear more people talking about the latest issue of The Tiny or Pebble Lake Review (Iā€™m totally biased since I have poems forthcoming in both) than I ever do the so-called biggies. I wish there were more of these sorts of journals to satisfy my occasional lust for paper over pixelsā€¦

Then thereā€™s the web.., where thereā€™s a lot of good stuff being published, and better yet, itā€™s free, accessible, like a broadside handed out on every corner, everywhere in the world. Iā€™m thinking especially as I start sending out all this newer work, the girl show poems mostly, Iā€™m sticking to the web, mostly with a few exceptions of little mag print faves. But Iā€™m not going to be clamoring for that bottom rung on the level to poetry stardom, whatever that is, if it exists at all. What matter is finding readers, and I really donā€™t think mine are there anywhere on that ladder.

When I used to publish more on the web, when that was pretty much the ONLY place I published since I couldnā€™t afford all those SASEā€™s , people were so nice. Youā€™d get a lot of support for your work from editors, and even occasional fan mail. A certain instantaneousness of response. I myself am much quicker to offer feedback with an e-mail link than having to write a letter, address it, stamp it, etc. The web poetry world seemed smaller, though ironically, it was much bigger. I had a feeling people were reading my work, responding to it. (Maybe it was all in my head..) I like that. Thatā€™s what keeps me working--not sending things off into the abyss to maybe have them shoved into an SASE two years later with a generic ā€œsorryā€œ, when the poems so old and you've moved on to something else.

Comments

Unknown saidā€¦
yes- I'm with you. The web has been very, very kind to me over the past 12 years and now the number of quality journals is incredible!

I can't find a copy of most journals here in Richmond, VA and I certainly can't afford to pay for samples of them. I took a class with David Baker of the Kenyon Review- he said there is vert little chance any of us would ever have a poem in that journal- why try?